About your Search

20121112
20121120
Search Results 0 to 11 of about 12 (some duplicates have been removed)
. david? >> i think charlie, that he denied up loving the job. he loved the science technology toys that the cia director uniquely has. i think he did take the job because it was the next great challenge when he couldn't be chairman of the joint chiefs. when i think about petraeus, the person, the interesting question for me is after this terrible fall, this big scandal, you know, he'll have a period of rehabilitation. but what's the next challenge that this smart ambitious guy will try to take on. some place like princeton still want him, will another university want him. on the morning that this broke, i actually spent an e-mail saying he was likely to leave following all what norah was saying. i don't know the answer. what he would have done if he had another couple weeks. they didn't say anything. when finally the story broke said sorry i couldn't get back to you earlier but you understand. >> rose: i also have been told, we're all talking about speculation what people said if they wanted it more than someone else but he did not have at the cia the kind of support system aroun
technology. and recently it is the digital footprint of dalliances that have led to some spectacular falls. remember congressman anthony weiner? he tweeted a photo of his privates. the story broke, he denied it, claiming his twitter account had been hacked, eventually fessed up and resigned. >> i apologize first and foremost to my wife, and to my family. >> there was client number nine, aka eliot spitzer, the governor of new york, and former cnn anchor. when investigators followed his money, it revealed he spent thousands as a regular client of a call girl. he, too, stepped down. >> i've acted in a way that violates my obligations to my family, and that violates my or any sense of right and wrong. >> and now comes general petraeus, done in by a simple click of the mouse. >> e-mail traffic is -- it is amazing that e-mail is still being used in such a careless and reckless fashion because it is just evidence against you. >> modern science can also play a role. remember president clinton and the dna on a blue dress belonging to a certain white house intern, monica lewinsky. >> i did not have
, that he denied up loving the job. he loved the science technology toys that the cia director uniquely has. i think he did take the job because it was the next great allenge when he couldn't be chairman of the joint chiefs. when i think about petraeus, the person, the interesting question for me is after this terrible fall, this big scandal, you know, he'll have a period of rehabilitation. but what's the next challenge that this smart ambitious guy will try to take on. some place like princeton still want him, will another university want him. on the morning that this broke, i actually spent an e-mail sayi he s likely to leave following all what norah was saying. i don't know the answer. what he would have done if he had another couple weeks. they didn't say anything. when finally the story broke said sorry i couldn't get back to you earlier but you understand. >> rose: i also have been told, we're all talking about speculation what people said if they wanted it more than someone else but he did not have at the cia the kind of support system around him that gave him a certain confidence
Search Results 0 to 11 of about 12 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)